It depends on the type of science. Science just means “the study of”
There are sciences of objective measurements and reproducible experiments. There are sciences lacking experimentation and are purely of observation and speculative theories to explain the observations such as evolution. Religious studies can even be classified as “sciences” when you take into account the formalized methodologies used for contributing to the subject.
One thing I take issue with is the sciences of observation being given the same level of credibility as reproducible experiments. Maybe I am biased as I am an engineer but I feel that I can objectively believe in physical sciences with objective measurements that can be reproduced by experiments. Other things like people taking guesses to explain things like how the universe was created billions of years ago or by guessing how the continents drifted from Pangea to their current arrangement, or by looking at fossils and guessing how life evolved from single cells into progressively more complicated life forms... ok I am not against it if that’s what really happened, but can someone actually “prove it” to me.
At best some sciences can only give us some circumstantial or analogical evidence, but it still requires that leap of faith if you want to believe in it. In that way, some sciences are kind of similar to religion.