the problem is, when presenting "nesmaker" as a label, it looks like a warning- it makes "nesmaker" a pejorative term. Is a Nesmaker game the same quality as a 'from the ground up' assembly game? i've heard folks snipe-in and say the nesmaker is glitchy. meaning: there are glitches embedded in the the tool itself that effect the game, which can't be fixed in a way that a ground-up assembly game can be tested and fixed. so...
IF you can show a video, screenshot, whatever, of a nesmaker game that is unfixable glitchy because of the nesmaker system itself, THEN slap the "nesmaker" warning on it.
IF you can't provide such evidence and no one should can tell the difference, THEN this is divisive elitist home-brew gatekeeping that makes the community look bad. The differentiation between tools is an argument that disrupts the focus of effort: making a video game. The only reason to put the NesMaker sticker on it is to advertise Joe's path towards home brewing- anything else feels like a warning or judgement of quality, whether intended or not.