Quest4Nes

Their prices arent that bad on anything not extremely popular. First Party and the most popular games were jacked up price wise, but the nes and snes classic and switch online put a big dent in original copies of the common popular titles. So it makes their prices right now look even worse.

Kc has a decent secondary. They struggle vs the run which eats time. Their D has been better, and KC is a really hard place to play. I wouldn't be surprised by a lower scoring game than expected. Might still go over but im not certain it will go way over as much as you seem it might.

And if thats the case Id be pissed off if those games were pro switch only, if they were good games. Im sure any first party games nintendo in house would make them work on everything.

unfortunately this world is what you have, and its not always what you want. You cant orchestrate attacks against the United States and expect nothing to happen. We struck, they appear to have blinked for show/domestic PR. We will see what happens

Then you should feel great that zero reported deaths from the "retaliation" and looks like Iran is backing down. We will see what happens. To think he acts and doesnt think of any repercussions is pretty naive.

Like one guy I was listening to was saying, saying their were millions at this mans funeral is like when North Korean voter turnout was 99.9%. You know why. State controlled media/fear of repercussions for you and your family will probably get you to turn out to the funeral. Besides you live in Iran. What the hell else are you going to do.

looks like a blink to me. You say you are done responding and you kill zero americans? And to say this is a distraction? Why the hell would he distract by starting a war? Nobody wants to go through a war. It would be hugely unpopular, and he ran on and said many times he is not a war president. It would legitimately be the worst distraction you could possibly create. Think about it for a second. Lets wait to see what happens. If they start a war with Iran, then we can talk. We took out a terrorist. Former administrations have struck targets with drones left and right. Where was the outrage?. Lets wait and see what happens. It seems like whatever strategy he does, you arent going to like it. He is coming at it at a different approach that isnt pay Iran money to appease them. Lets see how it plays out. Hopefully it doesnt lead to war. After the strike tonight, it looks like Iran doesnt want to go to war either. I dont blame them, theyd be crushed.

Pretty tired of the post office always changing methids and costs. Leads to bisiness instability and uncertainty

Sorry, not going to shed a tear over killing a terrorist. There never is a perfect time. It will always be wrong if your team isnt the one that does it right?

To say that being a civilian bystander? You werent there. You have no clue what he was planning. Its not like we invaded his country and killed him. He was in iraq. He just led a strike against a US Target. How and when are we supposed to kill him? There was no balance. You have to lay down the law at some point. To sit there and to lecture on when the right time to do something like this as just a person on the internet, well man you must no more than alot of others. Could it have been wrong? yea it could, but to sit there and already be stating that is fact is foolish and blind bias. You dont know anything. Just like most of us.

I think it would absolutely be bullshit if you had games that only worked for a switch pro. It will divide your library up. I think its foolish. The switch is what 3 years old or really not even for a couple more months? and you are going to tell all those people , hey you cant play the newest best stuff because you jumped on early on. The Switch had a huge lull in getting new games for awhile year 2, so basically only a couple years of new content then a new system? Id kinda be pissed off. If what they are saying with capability of playing larger games, that sure sounds like games wouldnt work on older switches. That would be garbage. Nintendo pump out some first party stuff, and please no more old wii u ports.

Sounds much more crisp to me

literally everywhere?

wtf is the matter with you? you call yourself a super jimtendo?

I didnt make any picks but every game went the way I wanted/preffered to win. Good NFL wild card weekend. No more patriots, eagles, saints. Good Start. Now just need to eliminate the Packers, 49ers, Seahawks in the next 2 weeks. Dont care who wins after that

LMAO. Dude is going to haunt you forever

They already dug those up

dude you were wrong, just admit it. ya fucked up. Why would you even include 2021 when that has no inclusion in the decade whatsoever. If someone were running a sale and said now-2021. So that means the sale ends at the end of 2020? That makes no sense. just admit your mistake. its ok

Lets count 2011 (1 year) 2012 (2 years) 2013 (3 years) 2014 (4 years) 2015 (5 years) 2016 (6 years) 2017 (7 years) 2018 (8 years) 2019 (9years) 2020 (10 years) 2021 (11 years) for being a counting fanatic, you arent showing it. Here let me fix what you are trying to say. Jan 1st , 2011- Dec 31st 2020 is the "official decade" since we dont have a year zero (that is not 2021 that would be the start of a new decade) Yes weve all heard that 100 times. Its lame and no one cares. So before you bitch people out about how much smarter you are and cant believe how dumb we all are for not mentioning it , fix your facts first

There were parts I liked in it. It wasnt horrible to me. But compared to the other 2 newer ones, I like it the least But to say on this list its a better film than interstellar . Well thats just stupid.

was shocked it was that high. My least favorite of the 3 movies. I guess you could say it was the best "film" with character arcs and such of the 3 in a standalone sense, but man it was by far the worst "star wars" movie of the decade.

I was actually going to correct him on that and was typing it as we speak but you there ya go. beat me to it.. Yup he said 2011-2001 which would be 11 years.

yes but you can have a symbolic decade that makes sense or you could use the lame defintion you bring up. Its like arguing that a business had a bad year, and then you have you " well actually we are talking about the fiscal year so it was ok" Enough with semantics. These kind of arguments are a waste of time and annoy the piss out of me lol.

dont be that person. effin annoying. We arent using the Julian calendar or Gregorian calendar as an official decade counter. We are using a symbolic decade. We dont count 1990 as part of the 80s because that is stupid Ive heard people try to make this argument about 1000 times in the last few days. Its not original or clever. Everytime its mentioned all you hear is either nothing but an eyeroll or ..."would you just shut up"

Ive seen 27 off this list out of these interstellar was probably my favorite.