Jump to content
IGNORED

Thoughts on being Pandered to?


Californication

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Hammerfestus said:

In all seriousness Jeopardy is done for all intents and purposes.  When they let this douche host

Wz6XI06.jpg 
with all his essential oils and magic crystals and other snake oil you might as well hang it up.

Yeah the petition for Levar Burton has over 100k signatures. Who in there right mind wants to see Katie Couric or Dr.Oz!?  

https://www.change.org/p/sony-pictures-entertainment-levar-burton-should-be-the-next-host-of-jeopardy

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CodysGameRoom said:

 

Then stop objectifying females. Her outfit is not the problem. It's the men objectifying them. Do you think that women who are raped "asked for it" too?

Why? Honestly curious as to why? Is it because porn doesn't align with your religious beliefs? 

 

Honestly the slut-shaming and anti-female vibe in this thread is fucking disgusting and cringeworthy. 

 

This young lady is sexualizing herself. She is being very overt about it. Like I alluded to initially, there isn't anything *wrong* with that. I just don't like it. She won't be getting any of my clicks of my money.

That being said, if she wasn't being overtly sexual about it, her outfit wouldn't bother me. 

If a youtuber wanted to start being a porn model, go for it. Same with if a porn model wants to start an unrelated youtube channel, go for it. Porn is legally age restricted content, however. The fact that this specific content is potentially marketed to children via YouTube is reprehensible. It's completely feasible that a 12 or 13 year old boy can search for gaming videos and come across this, and then follow her link in the description. This young lady should not be allowed to do this and YouTube should not be allowing this to happen. And I find that "fucking disgusting and cringeworthy."

It has nothing to do with my spirituality.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Kguillemette said:

The fact that this specific content is potentially marketed to children via YouTube is reprehensible.

I'd love an example of where this type of content is marketed towards children.

17 minutes ago, Kguillemette said:

It's completely feasible that a 12 or 13 year old boy can search for gaming videos and come across this, and then follow her link in the description.

Your scenario is problem of the parents, not the content creator. If a parent does not want their teenage son viewing content like this, they should be monitoring what type of content they are viewing. It's the same with any type of media. Violent video games, movies, etc. 

18 minutes ago, Kguillemette said:

This young lady should not be allowed to do this

What's disgusting and cringeworthy is an adult male trying to dictate what a young woman can and can't /should and shouldn't do with her own body. You do not have the right to do so. To think otherwise is to spit in the face of women who are fighting for their rights. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CodysGameRoom said:

I'd love an example of where this type of content is marketed towards children.

Your scenario is problem of the parents, not the content creator. If a parent does not want their teenage son viewing content like this, they should be monitoring what type of content they are viewing. It's the same with any type of media. Violent video games, movies, etc. 

What's disgusting and cringeworthy is an adult male trying to dictate what a young woman can and can't /should and shouldn't do with her own body. You do not have the right to do so. To think otherwise is to spit in the face of women who are fighting for their rights.

 

You took my quotes completely out of context and deleted my actual viewpoints on the subject that covers this. 

"This young lady should not be allowed to do this" clearly refers to her linking to her porn site and not how she dresses. Yes, I will dictate that she should not be linking her porn to a place where a child can see it. If you find that disgusting and cringeworthy, so be it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kguillemette said:

 

You took my quotes completely out of context and deleted my actual viewpoints on the subject that covers this. 

"This young lady should not be allowed to do this" clearly refers to her linking to her porn site and not how she dresses. Yes, I will dictate that she should not be linking her porn to a place where a child can see it. If you find that disgusting and cringeworthy, so be it.

 

It's the internet -- EVERYWHERE is a "place where a child can see it".

 

Does Youtube have age ratings on their videos?  I know they at least have a "kids" content category which this could easily avoid.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, arch_8ngel said:

It's the internet -- EVERYWHERE is a "place where a child can see it".

What if a teenager came across her gaming videos and took a break from visiting Pornhub six times a day to check out her Onlyfans that he definitely isn't about to pay for?

Edited by DefaultGen
  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...