Jump to content

Bearcat-Doug

Member
  • Posts

    11,400
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    66
  • Feedback

    100%

Posts posted by Bearcat-Doug

  1. On 4/14/2024 at 10:12 PM, mbd39 said:

    Good ruleset.

    If we're playing TMNT2 I'd rather play through the entire game. But this game is even longer and goes on and on and on.

    I like this game, but it's way too long. 

     

    On 4/14/2024 at 10:12 PM, mbd39 said:

    Good ruleset.

    If we're playing TMNT2 I'd rather play through the entire game. But this game is even longer and goes on and on and on.

    I honestly think both of the NES TMNT beat em ups are way too long. I've no deathed both games and I think they still clock in at just over an hour. For contrast, I played Turtles in Time the other day and beat it in 21 minutes. I dont remember if I posted it in the unpopular game opinion thread or not, but I like that the SNES Final Fight cut out the industrial area level. Even with 5 areas, it still takes almost an hour to finish. Final Fight 2 went back to 6 stages and it's just way too tedious. Final Fight 3 added shortcuts in some of the stages which gives it the perfect balance since the player can decide if they want to take the shorter or the longer routes.

  2. 14 hours ago, NESfiend said:

    91,600 with one second place finish on race 8. Donezo. Cant believe I didnt finish it one time. Congrats, @PII - a well deserved victory. Tough to go 10 straight for sure with the orange car boost madness

    I was hoping to get in on this one, but it was just a super busy week. I figured you were gonna have this one locked up!

  3. 18 hours ago, BriGuy82 said:

    I'm at the end of Iron Sword. A game that I never made it past the first level when I was kid. I can't imagine any kid under the age of 10 ever beating this game. 

    I beat it when I was 8. For what it's worth I didn't have many other games to play so I didn't have much choice other than to stick with it.

    • Wow! 1
  4. 1 hour ago, rdrunner said:

    Worth noting is that we don't tend to waste our time voting on games that are actually bad.  It seems reasonable to me that we had scores of 5-10 for the games we have gone through.

    If we had a bunch more Superman 64's, we could easily see some lower scores.  The question then is whether we care enough to do that?

    There is probably someone that literally agonizes over rating a game a 3 or a 4.

    • Like 1
  5. 12 hours ago, the_wizard_666 said:

    Took a lot less practice than I thought...Volleyball is done.  At some point I realized I could relatively consistently get points off the serve when my team was on the left court.  It required near pixel perfect timing, but it was doable.  Just had to get good enough to get the ball back whenever I missed the timing.  I ended up winning in four sets, losing the second set but sweeping the third.  The fourth was pretty tight, as it required me to actually get points the "proper" way, but I was occasionally getting points on serves there too, which helped.  Most of my points in that set came from blocking their spikes, but that was also a bit of a crapshoot because it required almost perfect timing as well to execute.  All told, it's actually a pretty fun game overall, just kinda tough to get the hang of.

    I'm glad you got that one finished so I didn't have to do it this year. It doesn't take that long to win a game, but the precision timing and difficult controls really take any potential fun out of it. Volleyball is probably my least favorite black box game. Stack Up and DK Jr. Math might be worse, but those barely even qualify as games. 

×
×
  • Create New...