Jump to content
IGNORED

Movie Debate #42: Ghostbusters (1984)


Reed Rothchild

Rate it  

49 members have voted

  1. 1. Rating explanations down below

    • 10/10 - One of your very favorite movies of all time. Top 10.
    • 9/10 - Killer fucking movie. Everyone should watch it.
    • 8/10 - Great movie. Maybe one of the best released that year.
    • 7/10 - Very good movie, but not quite great.
    • 6/10 - Pretty good. You might enjoy the occasional watch, or tune in if you happen to catch it on cable.
    • 5/10 - It's okay, but maybe not something you'll go out of your way to watch.
    • 4/10 - Meh. There's plenty of better alternatives to this.
      0
    • 3/10 - Not very good.
      0
    • 2/10 - Not your cup of tea at all. Some people might like this, but you are not one of them.
      0
    • 1/10 - Horrible in every way.
      0
    • 0/10 - The Citizen Kane of painful experiences. You'd rather shove an icepick in your retinas than watch this.
      0
    • You haven't seen the movie, but you're interested in watching it.
      0
    • No interest in watching it.
      0


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Tulpa said:

Yeah, I think that's one of the worst effort sanitizing jobs I've seen for a major picture, and it has some stiff competition coming from Tremors. 😛

I think the crown goes to Blazing Saddles on that score. Pretty much totally bowdlerized that classic - adding insult to injury most of the replaced parts (if they bothered to do so) were not even remotely funny,

There is an interesting movie called "Skin Game" 1971 that some view as a precursor in some ways to Blazing Saddles. I don't think they could sanitize it enough to make the weenie crowd happy.  If you can wrap your head around the subject matter it is a good movie if you don't try to make it something it isn't.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

40 minutes ago, arch_8ngel said:

The first movie centers on a much better villain, and the "build-up" of the paranormal stuff is just better all around.

I can get behind that, Gozer is just so memorable, and especially the part with the Statue of Liberty in the second movie feels like a weak attempt at recreate the icon Stay Puft Marshmellow Man. All the good "horror" stuff from the first one is in the tail end of the first movie, though. The villain is more threatening throughout Ghostbusters 2, and I kinda like the silly part about New York having to learn to let go of their negativity 😄, I think that is a nice climax still.

What carries the movies up until that though, is the characters and comedy, and I think that's where the second movie seriously outdoes the first. 🤷‍♂️

Edited by Sumez
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't argue with anyone who rated it higher, but I gave it an 8.  @SumezIt is interesting how the film is more revered now than in it's hey-day.  I can't quite put my finger on why it is exactly, but I think that at least part of the reason is that the nostalgia factor is unusually high with this one.  It's unarguably one of those movies that defined the 80's, but for some reason, when I think of this one it seems even more 80's than: Terminator, Goonies, Breakfast Club etc. - take your pick.

Also, whenever I think of this one it always brings to mind Cecil B. Demille's famous quote: "Give me any two pages of the Bible and I'll give you a picture", because I always think of that scene in which Ray and Winston are driving across the Manhattan Bridge discussing the end of days interspersed with shots of the World Trade Center.  The somber quality stands out and it is purportedly the only scene in the movie that is not comedic at all. The track playing at the end of the scene is called "Judgement Day."  The whole ghosts being released from the containment unit plot point is derived from the 'opening of the bottomless pit' story.  Anyway, this is what I usually think of first when thinking of Ghostbusters.  There's a few handfuls of stories that get told over and over, and this is definitely one of 'em.

That scene in Ghostbusters 2 where Rick Moranis asks Annie Potts if she'd like to play Super May-rio Brothers always cracks me up. ;9

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by PII
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, PII said:

I wouldn't argue with anyone who rated it higher, but I gave it an 8.  @SumezIt is interesting how the film is more revered now than in it's hey-day.  I can't quite put my finger on why it is exactly, but I think that at least part of the reason is that the nostalgia factor is unusually high with this one.  It's unarguably one of those movies that defined the 80's, but for some reason, when I think of this one it seems even more 80's than: Terminator, Goonies, Breakfast Club etc. - take your pick.

Also, whenever I think of this one it always brings to mind Cecil B. Demille's famous quote: "Give me any two pages of the Bible and I'll give you a picture", because I always think of that scene in which Ray and Winston are driving across the Manhattan Bridge discussing the end of days interspersed with shots of the World Trade Center.  The somber quality stands out and it is purportedly the only scene in the movie that is not comedic at all. The track playing at the end of the scene is called "Judgement Day."  The whole ghosts being released from the containment unit plot point is derived from the 'opening of the bottomless pit' story.  Anyway, this is what I usually think of first when thinking of Ghostbusters.  There's a few handfuls of stories that get told over and over, and this is definitely one of 'em.

That scene in Ghostbusters 2 where Rick Moranis asks Annie Potts if she'd like to play Super May-rio Brothers always cracks me up. ;9

 

Hard to say it is "more 80's than" Goonies -- though I would agree it is "equally 80's" 😉

But honestly, that makes BOTH of those movies a "9" as an "everyone should watch it" to have insight into decade-defining movies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So after the "TV" edits posted here I saw a few more.  It got me thinking.  Obviously those scenes were shot during the movie with the intention of showing the movie on TV, instead of just comically overdubbing over it like Die Hard 2.  I wonder if when shown on TV, if thats where it became more of a kid movie?  OR did the toys come out during the same time?  Im under the impression after the movie came out, the TV version was a hit with kids.  Got popular for a cartoon show and thats when the toys came out.  Anyone know the history of this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back in the 80s movies didn't show up on TV or home video until a few years passed. It certainly wasn't like nowadays where a movie barely cools at the box office before the blu-ray is available.

The cartoon came out in 1986 (and I was watching it first run) but I didn't see the movie itself until sometime after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tulpa said:

Back in the 80s movies didn't show up on TV or home video until a few years passed. It certainly wasn't like nowadays where a movie barely cools at the box office before the blu-ray is available.

The cartoon came out in 1986 (and I was watching it first run) but I didn't see the movie itself until sometime after that.

Oh thats interesting.  I suppose they were just covering their TV butts for future airings.  I was born in 83, but I can't recall what I saw first.  I probably saw GB first along side the Real GB cuz I got the GB firehouse xmas of 87.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, guitarzombie said:

So after the "TV" edits posted here I saw a few more.  It got me thinking.  Obviously those scenes were shot during the movie with the intention of showing the movie on TV, instead of just comically overdubbing over it like Die Hard 2.  I wonder if when shown on TV, if thats where it became more of a kid movie?  OR did the toys come out during the same time?  Im under the impression after the movie came out, the TV version was a hit with kids.  Got popular for a cartoon show and thats when the toys came out.  Anyone know the history of this?

The cartoon was a BIG DEAL during a time that MAYBE kids get a chance to see the TV version once or twice a year on ABC broadcast.  Cartoon drove the whole toy line.  (and were almost certainly a simultaneous release -- back then, toy lines tooled up and tended to release simultaneously, or just ahead, of the show or movie)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, arch_8ngel said:

Ghostbusters, Goonies, Gremlins... Ghost Dad? 😛😉

Oh yes, Ghost Dad came out right before a certain other Ghost movie...one became an all time classic and the other, well...let's just say the star of that not-so-successful "ghost" movie should've stuck with peddlin' de Jell-O puddin'...

Edited by Estil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Estil said:

Oh yes, Ghost Dad came out right before a certain other Ghost movie...one became an all time classic and the other, well...let's just say the star of that not-so-successful "ghost" movie should've stuck with peddlin' de Jell-O puddin'...

Just looked it up to see that this one has 6% on rotten tomatoes!  Hilarious.  I think I actually watched it in the theater as a kid 😛

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Tulpa said:

Back in the 80s movies didn't show up on TV or home video until a few years passed. It certainly wasn't like nowadays where a movie barely cools at the box office before the blu-ray is available.

The cartoon came out in 1986 (and I was watching it first run) but I didn't see the movie itself until sometime after that.

Same here. I rented the movie as a kid, but it was a few years after the cartoon started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding TV edits, I think it's been standard practice for at least 25 years that if you make a movie, you have a couple of takes where your replace the really offensive dialog.

I don't know why, but my favorite was Pineapple Express.  Yes, they made a TV edit and somehow I managed to see it.  A lot of people were called "casseroles" in that one.  That film wasn't high on my priority list so I've still not seen the theater cut.  Even though it's a movie about weed dealing, they managed to make an entire move that was acceptable for a channel like USA.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Editorials Team · Posted
14 hours ago, JamesRobot said:

Fucking 10.  

C'mon.  Its Dan Aykroyd, Harold Ramis, Bill Murray, Sigourney Weaver, and Rick Motherfuckin Moranis.  Quintessential 80s flick.  

Racist.  You forgot Keith David.

 

(that's a double joke, don't @ me)

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...